vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Root, Inc. (ROOT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Root, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($397.0M vs $336.0M, roughly 1.2× Federal Realty Investment Trust). On growth, Root, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.5% vs 8.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Root, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
Root Insurance Company is an online car insurance company operating in the United States.
FRT vs ROOT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.0M | $397.0M |
| Net Profit | $129.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 53.8% | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | 38.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | 21.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 103.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.49 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $397.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.3M | $387.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.5M | $382.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $309.2M | $349.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.4M | $326.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $303.6M | $305.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.1M | $289.2M |
| Q1 26 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.9M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.8M | $18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | $-7.8M |
| Q1 26 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.0% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | -2.7% |
| Q1 26 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.49 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.78 | $1.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | $1.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.74 | $1.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.70 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | $-0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $107.4M | $669.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.0B | $200.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $284.3M |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.53× | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $107.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.4M | $669.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.3M | $653.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.0M | $641.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.2M | $609.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.4M | $599.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.0M | $674.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.2M | $667.2M |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $200.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $200.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $200.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $200.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $200.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $300.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $300.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $284.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $265.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $244.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $228.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $203.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $151.3M |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.98× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $206.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $622.4M | $206.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.8M | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.7M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.0M | $26.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $574.6M | $195.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.1M | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.7M | $62.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $195.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $62.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 59.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | 2.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.81× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.36× | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
