vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.0M vs $223.8M, roughly 1.5× SILVERCORP METALS INC). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs -1.3%, a 39.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SILVERCORP METALS INC's revenue compounded faster (87.6% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
FRT vs SVM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.0M | $223.8M |
| Net Profit | $129.7M | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 53.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 38.6% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 103.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.49 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $223.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.5M | $72.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $309.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.4M | $172.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $303.6M | $114.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.1M | $60.0M |
| Q1 26 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.7M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.9M | $28.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.5M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | $13.2M |
| Q1 26 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.1% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.0% | 30.0% |
| Q1 26 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.0% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | 22.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.78 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.74 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $107.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.53× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $107.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $107.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $622.4M | $107.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.7M | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $574.6M | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.1M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.7M | $28.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.77× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.36× | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | 2.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
