vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.0M vs $220.8M, roughly 1.5× UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 5.8%, a 32.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs 8.7%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
FRT vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.0M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $129.7M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 53.8% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 38.6% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 103.5% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.49 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.3M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.5M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $309.2M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.4M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $303.6M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.1M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | $129.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.6M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.9M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.8M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.5M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | 53.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.8% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.0% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.6% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.0% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.49 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.49 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.69 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.78 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.74 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.70 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $107.4M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.0B | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.53× | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $107.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.4M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.3M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.0M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.2M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.4M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.0M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.2M | $115.5M |
| Q1 26 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $239.4M |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | $706.0M |
| Q1 26 | 1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.53× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $622.4M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.8M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.7M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.0M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $574.6M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.1M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.7M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.80× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.40× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.81× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.77× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.36× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.52× | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FRT
Segment breakdown not available.
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |