vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $26.0M, roughly 1.6× FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $-12.7M).
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
FSP vs NAMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | -28.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.9% | 45.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.2% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -28.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $607.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $892.9M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $607.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $682.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $892.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $901.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $903.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $916.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $946.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.8M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.7M | $7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.6% | 17.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 63.0% | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-648.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | -48.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 63.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
