vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.4M vs $26.0M, roughly 1.5× FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs -28.1%, a 83.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.1% vs -8.2%). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-12.7M). Over the past eight quarters, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC's revenue compounded faster (14.1% CAGR vs -8.7%).
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
FSP vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $-7.3M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | -28.1% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.1% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.3M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.1M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.8M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.2M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.3M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.4M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.5M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.6M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -27.9% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.2% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.9% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.9% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.4% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.0% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | -28.1% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -30.5% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -29.5% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.1% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.0% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -52.6% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.2% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.2% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.08 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.21 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.20 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.07 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.6M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $607.0M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $892.9M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.6M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.4M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.4M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.1M | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.2M | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $607.0M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.3M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.7M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.4M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $655.9M | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.4M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $682.1M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $703.9M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $892.9M | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $901.0M | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $903.2M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $916.4M | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $946.9M | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.5M | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.8M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.7M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -48.6% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 63.0% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-25.3M | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.3M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.5M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-648.0K | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-12.7M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.9M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.2M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.8M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | -48.6% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -21.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.7% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.2% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.7% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -50.8% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | 63.0% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.9% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.1% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FSP
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
