vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FITLIFE BRANDS, INC. (FTLF) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $25.9M, roughly 1.6× FITLIFE BRANDS, INC.). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $239.0K).
FitLife Brands, Inc. is a health and wellness firm developing, marketing and distributing premium nutritional supplements, sports nutrition products and weight management solutions. It serves North American fitness enthusiasts, athletes and health-focused consumers via retail and e-commerce channels.
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
FTLF vs NAMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.9M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 72.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -20.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $921.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.8% | 45.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 29.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $43.6M | — |
| Total Assets | $106.3M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $106.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $244.0K | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $239.0K | $7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.9% | 17.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $244.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $957.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $239.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.99× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.33× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTLF
| US | $24.3M | 94% |
| Other | $1.7M | 6% |
NAMM
Segment breakdown not available.
