vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortive (FTV) and PACS Group, Inc. (PACS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PACS Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× Fortive). Fortive runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 4.4%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PACS Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs 7.7%). Over the past eight quarters, PACS Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (20.5% CAGR vs -17.0%).
Fortive Corporation is an American industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington. The company specializes in providing essential technologies for connected workflow solutions; designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing professional and engineered products, software and services. Their products and services are split into three strategic segments; Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. As of Decem...
FTV vs PACS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $136.4M | $59.7M |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.9% | 7.0% |
| Net Margin | 12.8% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.7% | 18.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.1% | 3022.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $981.4M |
| Q1 26 | $136.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $185.7M | $59.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.6M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.9M | $28.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.8M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.6M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.1M | $-10.9M |
| Q1 26 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.0% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | 22.3% |
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | -1.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $0.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $356.1M | $197.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.5B | $353.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.1B | $946.8M |
| Total Assets | $11.6B | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | 0.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $356.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $375.5M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.8M | $355.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $294.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.1M | $287.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $813.3M | $157.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.3M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | $73.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $353.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $411.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $946.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $871.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $806.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2B | $750.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2B | $709.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $660.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5B | $572.1M |
| Q1 26 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.7B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3B | $3.9B |
| Q1 26 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | 0.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $234.8M | $-3.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $193.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.72× | -0.06× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $935.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $234.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $204.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.2M | $52.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.7M | $150.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $502.2M | $64.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.0M | $209.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.9M | $34.8M |
| Q1 26 | $193.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $313.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $153.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $465.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.83× | -0.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.99× | 3.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.41× | 5.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.41× | 33.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.07× | 13.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
