vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortive (FTV) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fortive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.0× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). Fortive runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs 14.3%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fortive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.6% vs 1.7%). Fortive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($313.8M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -14.2%).
Fortive Corporation is an American industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington. The company specializes in providing essential technologies for connected workflow solutions; designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing professional and engineered products, software and services. Their products and services are split into three strategic segments; Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. As of Decem...
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
FTV vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $185.7M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 16.5% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.6% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.60 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $185.7M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $166.6M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $171.9M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.8M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.6M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.1M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $207.4M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 63.2% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.2% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.0% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.8% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 59.3% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.7% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.6% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.50 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.63 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.58 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $375.5M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.5B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $11.7B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.50× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $375.5M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.8M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $892.1M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $813.3M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.3M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $704.6M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $11.7B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.5B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.3B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.50× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.36× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.38× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $313.8M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.0% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.83× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $956.4M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.2M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.7M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $502.2M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $459.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.9M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.7M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $313.8M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $153.1M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.5M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $215.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $465.2M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.2M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $279.7M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $230.3M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.1% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.83× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.99× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.41× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.41× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.07× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.24× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FTV
Segment breakdown not available.
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
