vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FULTON FINANCIAL CORP (FULT) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FULTON FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.2M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.6× T1 Energy Inc.). FULTON FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 28.2% vs -62.0%, a 90.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Fulton Financial Corporation is an American regional financial services holding company, headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
FULT vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.2M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $94.8M | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | 28.2% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.9% | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.55 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.6M | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $324.1M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.4M | $53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $319.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $317.7M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.7M | $0 |
| Q1 26 | $94.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.5M | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.2M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.0M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $95.0M | $-27.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.2% | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.8% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | -44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.0% | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | -30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.53 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.53 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $32.2B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $219.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $603.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $201.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $561.6M |
| Q1 26 | $32.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.2B | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8B | $644.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $304.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.1M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.7M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $703.0K | $-44.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.0M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.8M | $-28.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-35.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -138.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 54.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FULT
Segment breakdown not available.
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |
