vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. (FYBR) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.3× Snap-on). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs -5.0%, a 26.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.2% vs 2.7%). Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $-315.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.3% CAGR vs 2.0%).
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. is an American telecommunications company with a fiber-optic network and cloud-based services owned by Verizon. It was previously known as Citizens Utilities Co., Citizens Communications Co., and Frontier Communications Corp.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
FYBR vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-76.0M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 64.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | -5.0% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.2% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.3% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-76.0M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-123.0M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-64.0M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-118.0M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-82.0M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-123.0M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 64.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.6% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.1% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.30 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.49 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.26 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.48 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.33 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.49 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $336.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.7B | — |
| Total Assets | $21.6B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $506.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $750.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.6B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.3B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.9B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.2B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.2B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $504.0M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-315.0M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.5% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 53.4% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.4B | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $504.0M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $477.0M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $519.0M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $294.0M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $618.0M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $335.0M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-315.0M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-368.0M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-238.0M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-498.0M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-81.0M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-252.0M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-331.0M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.5% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.2% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.9% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.5% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.2% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.9% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.1% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 335.00× | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FYBR
| Consumer | $826.0M | 54% |
| Business And Wholesale | $707.0M | 46% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
