vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC (GCBC) and HARTE HANKS INC (HHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HARTE HANKS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.9M vs $22.2M, roughly 1.8× GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC). GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 46.3% vs 5.5%, a 40.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.8% vs -15.4%). GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($6.2M vs $-686.0K). Over the past eight quarters, GREENE COUNTY BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs -6.4%).
Bank of Greene County is an American federally-chartered savings bank headquartered in Catskill, NY. The bank's branches are located in the Upstate New York counties of Greene, Columbia, Albany, Ulster, and Rensselaer.
Harte Hanks is a global marketing services company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. Harte Hanks services include analytics, strategy, marketing technology, creative services, digital marketing, customer care, direct mail, logistics, and fulfillment.
GCBC vs HHS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.2M | $39.9M |
| Net Profit | $10.3M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 52.0% | -0.3% |
| Net Margin | 46.3% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.8% | -15.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 37.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.60 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $22.2M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.5M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.5M | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $41.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.9M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $47.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.6M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.7M | $45.4M |
| Q4 25 | $10.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.3M | $-335.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $-392.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $142.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7M | $-27.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9M | $-171.0K |
| Q4 25 | 52.0% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.6% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.0% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.4% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 46.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.2% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.1% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.6% | -61.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.3% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.55 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.37 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $-3.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.34 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $258.3M | $20.5M |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $91.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $155.5M | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.4M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $190.4M | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.5M |
| Q4 25 | $258.3M | $20.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.2M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $238.8M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $229.0M | $21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.4M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.3M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.0M | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $199.2M | $20.0M |
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $91.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $95.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $100.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $101.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $108.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $109.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $113.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.4M | $737.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $6.2M | $-686.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.0% | -1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | 0.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $47.3M | $-4.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.4M | $737.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $-818.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.9M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $6.2M | $-686.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.3M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3M | $-923.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.4M | $926.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9M | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 133.3% | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 141.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.3% | -13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.2% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | -20.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.70× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.95× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GCBC
Segment breakdown not available.
HHS
| Fulfillment And Logistics Services | $17.3M | 43% |
| Customer Care | $13.7M | 34% |
| Other | $8.9M | 22% |
