vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GREEN DOT CORP (GDOT) and Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GREEN DOT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($498.6M vs $367.2M, roughly 1.4× Tempus AI, Inc.). GREEN DOT CORP runs the higher net margin — -9.4% vs -14.8%, a 5.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tempus AI, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (83.0% vs 14.3%). Tempus AI, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-41.5M vs $-76.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Tempus AI, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (58.7% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Green Dot Corporation is an American financial technology and bank holding company headquartered in Austin, Texas. It is the world's largest prepaid debit card company by market capitalization. Green Dot is also a payment platform company and is the technology platform used by Apple Cash, Uber, and Intuit. The company was founded in 1999 by Steve Streit as a prepaid debit card for teenagers to shop online. In 2001, the company pivoted to serving the "unbanked" and "underbanked" communities. I...
Tempus AI, Inc. is an American health technology company founded in 2015 by Eric Lefkofsky in Chicago, Illinois. It was established by Lefkofsky soon after his wife was diagnosed with breast cancer. Tempus uses data and artificial intelligence (AI) to create precision medicine services, including diagnostics, for oncology, cardiology, radiology, and depression. The company went public on the Nasdaq on June 14, 2024, under the ticker symbol "TEM."
GDOT vs TEM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $498.6M | $367.2M |
| Net Profit | $-46.8M | $-54.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.5% | -16.7% |
| Net Margin | -9.4% | -14.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | 83.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1017.6% | -316.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $498.6M | $367.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $334.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $482.7M | $314.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $537.2M | $255.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.1M | $200.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $393.7M | $180.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $392.5M | $166.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.3M | $145.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-46.8M | $-54.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-30.8M | $-80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-47.0M | $-42.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $-68.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.8M | $-75.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-28.7M | $-552.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $-64.7M |
| Q4 25 | -5.5% | -16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.0% | -18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.3% | -26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.7% | -29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.0% | -321.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | -36.5% |
| Q4 25 | -9.4% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.5% | -23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.7% | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | -26.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | -6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | -41.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.3% | -332.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.86 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $604.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $890.2M | $491.3M |
| Total Assets | $6.0B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $604.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $655.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $186.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $151.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $341.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $388.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $478.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $79.9M |
| Q4 25 | $890.2M | $491.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $913.3M | $507.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $920.9M | $309.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $947.7M | $326.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $873.6M | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $932.2M | $53.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.0M | $98.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $870.6M | $-1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $926.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $971.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $864.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-62.5M | $-36.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-76.3M | $-41.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.3% | -11.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.8% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $66.0M | $-239.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-62.5M | $-36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | $-119.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.0M | $44.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.7M | $-105.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.3M | $48.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.5M | $-97.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.2M | $-101.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-76.3M | $-41.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $-126.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.5M | $36.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $89.3M | $-107.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-45.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-37.0M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5M | $-105.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.7M | $-107.5M |
| Q4 25 | -15.3% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | -37.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | -42.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.4% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | -63.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.0% | -73.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.51× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GDOT
| B2B Services | $375.4M | 75% |
| Interchange Revenues | $44.4M | 9% |
| Processing And Settlement Service | $38.6M | 8% |
| Money Movement Services | $37.4M | 8% |
TEM
Segment breakdown not available.
