vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GREEN DOT CORP (GDOT) and UNITED THERAPEUTICS Corp (UTHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNITED THERAPEUTICS Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($790.2M vs $498.6M, roughly 1.6× GREEN DOT CORP). UNITED THERAPEUTICS Corp runs the higher net margin — 46.1% vs -9.4%, a 55.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GREEN DOT CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 7.4%). UNITED THERAPEUTICS Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($173.3M vs $-76.3M). Over the past eight quarters, UNITED THERAPEUTICS Corp's revenue compounded faster (8.0% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Green Dot Corporation is an American financial technology and bank holding company headquartered in Austin, Texas. It is the world's largest prepaid debit card company by market capitalization. Green Dot is also a payment platform company and is the technology platform used by Apple Cash, Uber, and Intuit. The company was founded in 1999 by Steve Streit as a prepaid debit card for teenagers to shop online. In 2001, the company pivoted to serving the "unbanked" and "underbanked" communities. I...
United Therapeutics Corporation is an American biotechnology company that develops pharmaceuticals and technologies related to organ transplantation, including xenotransplantation. Many of the company's products are focused towards lung disease and organ manufacturing. United Therapeutics is co-headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland and Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, with additional facilities in Magog and Bromont, Quebec; Melbourne and Jacksonville, Florida; Blacksburg, Virginia; ...
GDOT vs UTHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $498.6M | $790.2M |
| Net Profit | $-46.8M | $364.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.9% |
| Operating Margin | -5.5% | 45.1% |
| Net Margin | -9.4% | 46.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | 7.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1017.6% | 20.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $7.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $498.6M | $790.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $472.2M | $799.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $482.7M | $798.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $537.2M | $794.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.1M | $735.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $393.7M | $748.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $392.5M | $714.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.3M | $677.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-46.8M | $364.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-30.8M | $338.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-47.0M | $309.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $322.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $301.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.8M | $309.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-28.7M | $278.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $306.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 86.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 89.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.2% |
| Q4 25 | -5.5% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.0% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 45.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.3% | 48.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.7% | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.0% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | -9.4% | 46.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.5% | 42.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.7% | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 40.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 40.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.3% | 38.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 45.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.85 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $2.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $890.2M | $7.1B |
| Total Assets | $6.0B | $7.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $890.2M | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $913.3M | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $920.9M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $947.7M | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $873.6M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $932.2M | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.0M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $870.6M | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | $6.0B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6B | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $7.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $6.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-62.5M | $346.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-76.3M | $173.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15.3% | 21.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.8% | 21.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $66.0M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-62.5M | $346.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | $562.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.0M | $191.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.7M | $461.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.0M | $341.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.3M | $377.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.5M | $232.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.2M | $376.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-76.3M | $173.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $351.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.5M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $89.3M | $386.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-45.1M | $254.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-37.0M | $300.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5M | $187.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.7M | $338.3M |
| Q4 25 | -15.3% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 44.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 48.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.3% | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.4% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.0% | 49.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 5.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.22× | 1.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.51× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.77× | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GDOT
| B2B Services | $375.4M | 75% |
| Interchange Revenues | $44.4M | 9% |
| Processing And Settlement Service | $38.6M | 8% |
| Money Movement Services | $37.4M | 8% |
UTHR
| Tyvaso DPI | $338.6M | 43% |
| Remodulin | $128.0M | 16% |
| Nebulized Tyvaso | $125.7M | 16% |
| Orenitram | $121.2M | 15% |
| Unituxin | $62.3M | 8% |
| Adcirca | $7.8M | 1% |
| Other | $6.6M | 1% |
