vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN) and Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($144.1M vs $104.1M, roughly 1.4× GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.).
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.
GDYN vs LANV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.1M | $144.1M |
| Net Profit | $-1.5M | — |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | 61.7% | -60.5% |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -150.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $104.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.1M | $144.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | $184.7M |
| Q1 26 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $306.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-817.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | 57.5% |
| Q1 26 | 61.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | -60.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | -35.0% |
| Q1 26 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $327.5M | $32.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $290.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $530.1M | $-116.4M |
| Total Assets | $605.0M | $632.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $327.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $342.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $336.8M | $32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | $19.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $290.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $136.4M |
| Q1 26 | $530.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $532.2M | $-116.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $517.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $517.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.4M | $100.1M |
| Q1 26 | $605.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $612.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $608.9M | $632.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.6M | $731.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-75.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $-75.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | $-36.2K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.92× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
