vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN) and TRICO BANCSHARES (TCBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRICO BANCSHARES is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($109.4M vs $104.1M, roughly 1.1× GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.). TRICO BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 251.6% vs -1.4%, a 253.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TRICO BANCSHARES posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 5.4%).
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
Trico Bancshares is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company operating Tri Counties Bank. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services including deposit products, mortgages, small business loans, and wealth management, primarily serving consumers and SMEs in Northern California.
GDYN vs TCBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.1M | $109.4M |
| Net Profit | $-1.5M | $33.6M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 61.7% | 42.6% |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | 251.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -150.6% | 15.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $104.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.2M | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.2M | $107.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.1M | $103.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $100.4M | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.3M | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.4M | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.0M | $97.9M |
| Q1 26 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $306.0K | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $26.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-817.0K | $29.0M |
| Q1 26 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 61.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.2% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 40.0% |
| Q1 26 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 251.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 221.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 29.7% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.05 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $0.87 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $327.5M | $157.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $530.1M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $605.0M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $327.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $342.1M | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $338.6M | $298.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $336.8M | $314.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $325.5M | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $145.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.3M | $320.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | $206.6M |
| Q1 26 | $530.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $532.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $517.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $517.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $400.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.4M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $605.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $612.9M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.2M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $608.9M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $590.9M | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.2M | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.3M | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $443.6M | $9.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $133.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $127.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 116.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $222.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $133.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | $109.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | $31.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.1M | $127.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.7% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.34× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.92× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.73× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.21× | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 3.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.15× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.