vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Take-Two Interactive is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.4× Gen Digital). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -5.5%, a 21.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 24.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 10.2%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
GEN vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $-262.0M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | 57.6% |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | -13.8% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | -19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $-1.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $12.9B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $-191.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $-226.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | -16.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
TTWO
Segment breakdown not available.
