vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gen Digital (GEN) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $625.1M, roughly 2.0× WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 13.4%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 15.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 4.6%).
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
GEN vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $192.0M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 78.4% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 34.9% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.5% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.1% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.31 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $986.0M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $974.0M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.0M | $597.3M |
| Q1 26 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.0M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.0M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $82.0M |
| Q1 26 | 78.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.2% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.8% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.3% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 80.4% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.1% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.3% | 47.7% |
| Q1 26 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.3% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.9% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.3% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 18.7% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.21 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.22 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.26 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $2.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $8.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $15.8B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $883.0M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.0M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.0M | $279.4M |
| Q1 26 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $15.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.94× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.33× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $541.0M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $409.0M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $473.0M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $326.0M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.0M | $85.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.0M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $470.0M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.0M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.0M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $262.0M | $78.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.3% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.04× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.03× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.33× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | 1.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.
