vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GERON CORP (GERN) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GERON CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.2M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.2× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs -39.0%, a 94.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GERON CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (67.1% vs 1.1%). Over the past eight quarters, GERON CORP's revenue compounded faster (1597.0% CAGR vs 14.1%).
Geron Corporation is a biotechnology company located in Foster City, California which specializes in developing and commercializing therapeutic products for cancer that inhibit telomerase.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
GERN vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.2M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $-18.4M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -29.4% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | -39.0% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 67.1% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.3% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.0M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.3M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $882.0K | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $304.0K | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.4M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.8M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.4M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-67.4M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-55.4M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.4% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.4% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -99.8% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7860.9% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18465.1% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -39.0% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.1% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -93.5% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7639.8% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18220.4% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $78.1M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.7M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $567.4M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.1M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.7M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.3M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.9M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $189.8M | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.7M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $259.5M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $268.2M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $292.3M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $306.7M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $344.9M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $567.4M | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $555.2M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $562.5M | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $444.9M | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $449.4M | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.1M | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-13.6M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.6M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.4M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.0M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-58.9M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-53.5M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-62.3M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-53.7M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-62.9M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6086.6% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20680.3% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 202.3% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GERN
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |