vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gevo, Inc. (GEVO) and IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gevo, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($45.3M vs $25.6M, roughly 1.8× IT TECH PACKAGING, INC.). IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. runs the higher net margin — -5.7% vs -13.2%, a 7.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gevo, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (695.6% vs 2.1%). Gevo, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.7M vs $1.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Gevo, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (237.1% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Gevo, Inc. is an American renewable chemicals and advanced biofuels company headquartered in unincorporated Douglas County, Colorado, in the Denver-Aurora metropolitan area. Gevo operates in the sustainability sector, pursuing a business model based on the concept of the "circular economy". The company develops bio-based alternatives to petroleum-based products using a combination of biotechnology and classical chemistry. Gevo uses the GREET model from Argonne National Laboratory as a basis f...
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
GEVO vs ITP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $45.3M | $25.6M |
| Net Profit | $-6.0M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.8% | -3.9% |
| Net Margin | -13.2% | -5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 695.6% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 65.9% | 26.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $45.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.4M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.1M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.6M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.2M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $-77.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.9M | $-3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.6% | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -69.2% | -31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -344.7% | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1221.8% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -456.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -580.0% | -51.0% |
| Q4 25 | -13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.6% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -74.6% | -32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -308.9% | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1076.6% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -399.3% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -473.1% | -54.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $81.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $164.8M | $4.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $466.3M | $152.0M |
| Total Assets | $718.9M | $175.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.35× | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $81.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $189.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $223.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $270.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $164.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.5M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.5M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $167.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $67.1M | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.0M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.3M | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | $466.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $468.9M | $152.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $474.1M | $152.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $469.8M | $152.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $489.5M | $156.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $504.7M | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.7M | $163.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $541.9M | $164.3M |
| Q4 25 | $718.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $685.2M | $175.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $702.1M | $175.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.8M | $175.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $583.9M | $177.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $583.9M | $190.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.9M | $191.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $633.6M | $177.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.35× | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.36× | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.14× | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.13× | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.13× | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.7M | $1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.3% | 5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 24.7% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-43.5M | $3.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.8M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.8M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.0M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.4M | $721.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-16.1M | $624.4K |
| Q4 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.6M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-29.9M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.5M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.8M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-20.6M | $668.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-33.6M | $615.4K |
| Q4 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -34.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -102.7% | -22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -587.2% | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1057.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -392.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -841.9% | 9.0% |
| Q4 25 | 24.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 256.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 496.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 174.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 438.9% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
