vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRIFFON CORP (GFF) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($692.4M vs $649.1M, roughly 1.1× GRIFFON CORP). GRIFFON CORP runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 5.2%, a 4.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.6% vs 2.6%). GRIFFON CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($99.3M vs $-76.5M). Over the past eight quarters, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.
GFF vs OII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $649.1M | $692.4M |
| Net Profit | $64.4M | $36.1M |
| Gross Margin | 41.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 5.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | -28.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.41 | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $692.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $649.1M | $668.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $662.2M | $742.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $613.6M | $698.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $611.7M | $674.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $632.4M | $713.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.7M | $679.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $647.8M | $668.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $36.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.4M | $177.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.6M | $71.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-120.1M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.8M | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.9M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.5M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.1M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.1% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.2% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.2% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.8% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.9% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.5% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.5% | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.41 | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.04 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.65 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.21 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.49 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $488.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.9M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | $695.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.0M | $504.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $488.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $487.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $482.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $108.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $907.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.9M | $842.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.7M | $773.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.8M | $714.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.9M | $698.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.5M | $651.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.48× | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.78× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.74× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $99.3M | $-76.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.3% | -11.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $278.9M | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.0M | $221.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.0M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.1M | $77.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $-80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.9M | $128.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $91.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.1M | $52.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-76.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.3M | $190.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.4M | $46.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $-106.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.5M | $94.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.6M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.5M | $29.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | -15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | 4.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 1.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | -1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.97× | 1.50× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |
OII
Segment breakdown not available.