vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GRIFFON CORP (GFF) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRIFFON CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($649.1M vs $625.1M, roughly 1.0× WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 9.9%, a 3.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 2.6%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $99.3M). Over the past eight quarters, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
GFF vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $649.1M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $64.4M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 41.1% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.41 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $649.1M | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $662.2M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $613.6M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $611.7M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $632.4M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.7M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $647.8M | $597.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $672.9M | $570.9M |
| Q4 25 | $64.4M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.6M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-120.1M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.8M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.9M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.5M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.1M | $82.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.1M | $72.6M |
| Q4 25 | 41.1% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.2% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.2% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.8% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.9% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.5% | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.2% | 46.9% |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.5% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.5% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.9% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 12.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.41 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.04 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.65 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.21 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.49 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.28 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.3M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $108.9M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.3M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.3M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.8M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.0M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.5M | $279.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.0M | $237.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $108.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $202.2M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.48× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.78× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.74× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.84× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.0M | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $99.3M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.3% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.66× | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $278.9M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.0M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $75.0M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.1M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $142.9M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.1M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.8M | $45.6M |
| Q4 25 | $99.3M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.4M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.4M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.5M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.6M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.5M | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.8M | $35.5M |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 6.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.66× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.97× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | 0.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.
