vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and M&T Bank (MTB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
M&T Bank is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.5× GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.). M&T Bank runs the higher net margin — 30.7% vs 14.8%, a 15.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, M&T Bank posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.8% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, M&T Bank's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -4.3%).
GlobalFoundries Inc. is a multinational semiconductor contract manufacturing and design company domiciled in the Cayman Islands and headquartered in Malta, New York. Created by the divestiture of the manufacturing arm of AMD in March 2009, the company was privately owned by Mubadala Investment Company, a sovereign wealth fund of the United Arab Emirates, until an initial public offering (IPO) in October 2021. Mubadala remains the majority owner of the company with an 82% stake.
M&T Bank Corporation is an American bank holding company headquartered in Buffalo, New York. It operates 950+ branches in 12 states and Washington D.C. across the Eastern United States, from Maine to Virginia. Until May 1998, the bank's holding company was named First Empire State Corporation.
GFS vs MTB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $249.0M | $759.0M |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.6% | 39.2% |
| Net Margin | 14.8% | 30.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 3.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 39.9% | 11.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $4.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $759.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $249.0M | $792.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $228.0M | $716.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.0M | $584.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $681.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $178.0M | $721.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.0M | $655.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.0M | $531.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 40.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 39.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 29.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.3% | 25.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 23.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.44 | $4.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.41 | $4.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.38 | $3.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.87 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $4.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $3.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.24 | $3.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.0B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $10.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.8B | $29.2B |
| Total Assets | $16.7B | $213.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $29.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8B | $28.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $28.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.1B | $29.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6B | $28.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3B | $28.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3B | $27.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $213.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.7B | $211.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.8B | $211.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5B | $210.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $208.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.1B | $211.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $208.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $215.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.42× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $595.0M | $3.0B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.39× | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $431.0M | $844.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $331.0M | $635.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $375.0M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $488.0M | $608.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.39× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.89× | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | 1.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.11× | -0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.59× | 2.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.64× | 1.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GFS
| Smart Mobile Devices | $752.0M | 45% |
| Automotive | $306.0M | 18% |
| Home And Industrial Io T | $258.0M | 15% |
| Goods Or Services Transferred Over Time | $198.0M | 12% |
| Communications Infrastructure Datacenter | $175.0M | 10% |
MTB
Segment breakdown not available.
