vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Guardant Health, Inc. (GH) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $281.3M, roughly 2.0× Guardant Health, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -45.7%, a 75.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Guardant Health, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.4% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Guardant Health, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.2% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Guardant Health, Inc. is an American biotechnology company based in Palo Alto, California. Co-founders Helmy Eltoukhy and AmirAli Talasaz serve as co-chief executive officers.

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

GH vs KIM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
2.0× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$281.3M
GH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GH
GH
+35.4% gap
GH
39.4%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
75.5% more per $
KIM
29.8%
-45.7%
GH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GH
GH
Annualised
GH
29.2%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Revenue
$281.3M
$558.0M
Net Profit
$-128.5M
$166.3M
Gross Margin
64.6%
Operating Margin
-43.0%
37.2%
Net Margin
-45.7%
29.8%
Revenue YoY
39.4%
4.0%
Net Profit YoY
-15.8%
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-1.01
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$281.3M
$542.5M
Q3 25
$265.2M
$535.9M
Q2 25
$232.1M
$525.2M
Q1 25
$203.5M
$536.6M
Q4 24
$201.8M
$525.4M
Q3 24
$191.5M
$507.6M
Q2 24
$177.2M
$500.2M
Net Profit
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$-128.5M
$151.2M
Q3 25
$-92.7M
$137.8M
Q2 25
$-99.9M
$163.0M
Q1 25
$-95.2M
$132.8M
Q4 24
$-111.0M
$166.0M
Q3 24
$-107.8M
$136.0M
Q2 24
$-102.6M
$119.7M
Gross Margin
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
64.6%
Q3 25
64.7%
Q2 25
65.0%
Q1 25
63.3%
Q4 24
61.6%
Q3 24
61.1%
Q2 24
59.1%
Operating Margin
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
-43.0%
36.4%
Q3 25
-37.3%
34.9%
Q2 25
-45.9%
39.2%
Q1 25
-54.6%
33.6%
Q4 24
-62.4%
31.7%
Q3 24
-61.3%
33.7%
Q2 24
-56.8%
32.1%
Net Margin
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
-45.7%
27.9%
Q3 25
-35.0%
25.7%
Q2 25
-43.0%
31.0%
Q1 25
-46.8%
24.8%
Q4 24
-55.0%
31.6%
Q3 24
-56.3%
26.8%
Q2 24
-57.9%
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$-1.01
Q3 25
$-0.74
Q2 25
$-0.80
Q1 25
$-0.77
Q4 24
$-0.90
Q3 24
$-0.88
Q2 24
$-0.84

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$378.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.5B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-99.3M
$10.4B
Total Assets
$2.0B
$19.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$378.2M
$211.6M
Q3 25
$580.0M
$159.3M
Q2 25
$629.1M
$226.6M
Q1 25
$698.6M
$131.3M
Q4 24
$525.5M
$688.6M
Q3 24
$585.0M
$789.0M
Q2 24
$933.7M
$126.4M
Total Debt
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.5B
$7.7B
Q3 25
$1.1B
Q2 25
$1.1B
Q1 25
$1.1B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$-99.3M
$10.4B
Q3 25
$-354.5M
$10.5B
Q2 25
$-305.5M
$10.5B
Q1 25
$-250.8M
$10.6B
Q4 24
$-139.6M
$10.7B
Q3 24
$-60.1M
$10.5B
Q2 24
$-1.6M
$10.6B
Total Assets
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$2.0B
$19.7B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$19.9B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$19.8B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$19.7B
Q4 24
$1.5B
$20.3B
Q3 24
$1.5B
$20.1B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-26.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-54.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-19.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
9.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-233.1M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-26.4M
$258.4M
Q3 25
$-35.4M
$332.4M
Q2 25
$-60.3M
$305.4M
Q1 25
$-62.7M
$223.8M
Q4 24
$-64.5M
$239.5M
Q3 24
$-51.1M
$295.9M
Q2 24
$-94.0M
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-54.2M
Q3 25
$-45.8M
Q2 25
$-65.9M
Q1 25
$-67.1M
$205.4M
Q4 24
$-83.4M
Q3 24
$-55.3M
Q2 24
$-99.1M
FCF Margin
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
-19.3%
Q3 25
-17.3%
Q2 25
-28.4%
Q1 25
-33.0%
38.3%
Q4 24
-41.3%
Q3 24
-28.9%
Q2 24
-55.9%
Capex Intensity
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
9.9%
0.0%
Q3 25
3.9%
0.0%
Q2 25
2.4%
0.0%
Q1 25
2.2%
3.4%
Q4 24
9.4%
Q3 24
2.2%
Q2 24
2.9%
Cash Conversion
GH
GH
KIM
KIM
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GH
GH

Oncology$189.9M68%
Biopharma Data$54.0M19%
Screening$35.1M12%
Licensing Other$2.2M1%

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

Related Comparisons