vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI) and Maison Solutions Inc. (MSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Maison Solutions Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($27.6M vs $15.0M, roughly 1.8× Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP). Maison Solutions Inc. runs the higher net margin — -18.0% vs -38.9%, a 20.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Maison Solutions Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-10.9% vs -33.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Maison Solutions Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.5% CAGR vs -18.1%).
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP is a publicly traded real estate investment partnership focused on acquiring, owning, and managing affordable and workforce multifamily housing properties across the United States. It prioritizes investments that generate stable long-term returns while expanding housing access for low and middle income communities.
Maison Solutions Inc.MSSEarnings & Financial Report
Maison Solutions Inc. is a specialty home goods retail company that provides a diverse portfolio of stylish, affordably priced furniture, home decor items, and daily household products. Its primary market is the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in China, serving mass consumers through both offline physical stores and online e-commerce channels.
GHI vs MSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.0M | $27.6M |
| Net Profit | $-5.8M | $-5.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | -33.4% | -4.9% |
| Net Margin | -38.9% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -33.6% | -10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -157.6% | -1840.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.31 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.6M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.1M | $32.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.6M | $29.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.3M | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.0M | $16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.4M | $13.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.8M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.1M | $-287.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1M | $-256.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.6M | $700.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6M | $-549.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | -33.4% | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.0% | -15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | -14.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.6% | -2.3% |
| Q4 25 | -38.9% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.0% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.9% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.6% | -16.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.6% | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.31 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.35 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.19 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $11.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $75.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.5M | $775.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.4M | $445.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $355.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.4M | $588.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.0M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $9.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $75.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $73.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $77.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $82.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $82.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $82.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $44.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $37.5M | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $37.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3M | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.25× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.11× | 1.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.32× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GHI
Segment breakdown not available.
MSS
| Perishables | $14.4M | 52% |
| Nonperishables | $13.2M | 48% |
