vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL Co (GIC) and Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($345.6M vs $260.4M, roughly 1.3× Smith Douglas Homes Corp.). GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL Co runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs 1.4%, a 2.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs -9.4%). GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($19.2M vs $8.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs 3.4%).
Global Industrial Company is a Port Washington, New York–based company providing industrial and MRO products through a system of branded e-Commerce websites and relationship marketers in North America. The primary brand is Global Industrial.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
GIC vs SDHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $345.6M | $260.4M |
| Net Profit | $14.6M | $3.5M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | -9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.4% | -14.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.37 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $345.6M | $260.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $353.6M | $262.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.9M | $223.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $321.0M | $224.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $302.3M | $287.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | $277.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $347.8M | $220.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $323.4M | $189.2M |
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.2M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | 34.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.6% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.1% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.9% | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.0% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.3% | 26.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.37 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.48 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.65 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.35 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.44 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.34 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $67.5M | $12.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $313.2M | $86.7M |
| Total Assets | $580.8M | $557.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $67.5M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.2M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.1M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.0M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.6M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.9M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.8M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.9M | $32.8M |
| Q4 25 | $313.2M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $316.0M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.2M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $287.9M | $76.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.1M | $73.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $279.2M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.4M | $62.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $260.2M | $59.7M |
| Q4 25 | $580.8M | $557.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $602.5M | $571.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $586.5M | $570.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.7M | $513.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $520.7M | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $531.6M | $460.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $542.5M | $429.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $517.4M | $401.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $9.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $19.2M | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.6% | 3.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.37× | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $74.7M | $-36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.7M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.7M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $-34.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.9M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.8M | $39.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $19.2M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.0M | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.3M | $-31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2M | $-35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.9M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1M | $-9.7M |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | -16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | -5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.21× | 10.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.26× | -12.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.25× | -13.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.57× | 4.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.93× | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | -3.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GIC
Segment breakdown not available.
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
