vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP (GLDD) and KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KILROY REALTY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($272.2M vs $256.5M, roughly 1.1× Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP). KILROY REALTY CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 4.9%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.5% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $50.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP's revenue compounded faster (13.6% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company is an American company providing construction services in dredging and land reclamation, currently the largest such provider in the United States. GLD&D operates primarily in the United States but conducts one-quarter of its business overseas. The company was based in Oak Brook, Illinois, but in October 2020 relocated its corporate headquarters to Houston, Texas.
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
GLDD vs KRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $256.5M | $272.2M |
| Net Profit | $12.6M | $17.1M |
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.5% | -5.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -35.9% | -73.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $256.5M | $272.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.2M | $279.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.8M | $289.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $242.9M | $270.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.8M | $286.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | $289.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.1M | $280.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $198.7M | $278.6M |
| Q4 25 | $12.6M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.0M | $55.7M |
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.31 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.4M | $179.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $378.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $517.1M | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $10.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | $179.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $372.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3M | $146.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | $165.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $625.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | $835.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.8M | $855.0M |
| Q4 25 | $378.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $517.1M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $502.1M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.9M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $479.9M | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.9M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $425.4M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $418.0M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.0M | $5.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $10.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $11.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $79.7M | $566.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.3M | $450.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.6% | 165.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.5% | 42.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.31× | 33.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $99.5M | $833.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $79.7M | $566.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.2M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.9M | $143.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.9M | $136.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.5M | $541.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | $167.9M |
| Q4 25 | $50.3M | $450.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | $115.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.1M | $440.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $147.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.0M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.5M | $151.9M |
| Q4 25 | 19.6% | 165.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.3% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | 153.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.0% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | 54.5% |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 6.31× | 33.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.87× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.82× | 3.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.69× | 8.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.02× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.39× | 1.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.83× | 3.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
