vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP (GLDD) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($256.5M vs $210.5M, roughly 1.2× T1 Energy Inc.). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs -62.0%, a 66.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. T1 Energy Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.0M vs $50.3M).
Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company is an American company providing construction services in dredging and land reclamation, currently the largest such provider in the United States. GLD&D operates primarily in the United States but conducts one-quarter of its business overseas. The company was based in Oak Brook, Illinois, but in October 2020 relocated its corporate headquarters to Houston, Texas.
Sony Energy Devices Corporation , is a Japanese multinational company specializing in a variety of areas in the energy industry, and is a wholly owned subsidiary and part of the Devices Group of Sony. The company was established in February 1975 in Fukushima, Japan.
GLDD vs TE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $256.5M | $210.5M |
| Net Profit | $12.6M | $-130.6M |
| Gross Margin | 20.9% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | -45.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.9% | -62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -35.9% | -375.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $256.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.2M | $210.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.8M | $132.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $242.9M | $53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $202.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.2M | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.1M | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | $198.7M | $0 |
| Q4 25 | $12.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7M | $-130.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.4M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $-27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.0M | $-28.5M |
| Q4 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | -45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | -44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.1% | -62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | -24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | -30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.49 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.31 | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.4M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $378.2M | $547.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $517.1M | $96.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.73× | 5.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.7M | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9M | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | $219.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.8M | $249.9M |
| Q4 25 | $378.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $547.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $591.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $603.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $602.3M |
| Q4 25 | $517.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $502.1M | $96.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.9M | $183.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $479.9M | $201.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $448.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $425.4M | $538.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $418.0M | $561.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.0M | $582.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $644.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $670.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $79.7M | $63.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.3M | $55.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.6% | 26.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.5% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $99.5M | $-42.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $79.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.2M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.9M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.9M | $-44.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $-28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | $-16.2M |
| Q4 25 | $50.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $-34.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.0M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.5M | $-37.7M |
| Q4 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.3% | -138.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.7% | 54.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.31× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.82× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLDD
Segment breakdown not available.
TE
| Related Party | $120.1M | 57% |
| Nonrelated Party | $90.4M | 43% |