vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GCI Liberty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($257.0M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.0× PicoCELA Inc.). PicoCELA Inc. runs the higher net margin — -125.2% vs -150.6%, a 25.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. GCI Liberty, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($21.0M vs $-256.6M).
GCI Communication Corp (GCI) is a telecommunications corporation operating in Alaska. Through its own facilities and agreements with other providers, GCI provides Internet access, landline, and cellular telephone service. It is a subsidiary of GCI Liberty, Inc.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
GLIBA vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $257.0M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $-387.0M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -189.9% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | -150.6% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.34 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $257.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $252.6M |
| Q3 25 | $-387.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-316.2M |
| Q3 25 | -189.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -114.8% |
| Q3 25 | -150.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -125.2% |
| Q3 25 | $-13.34 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.0M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $985.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $124.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $456.8M |
| Q3 25 | $985.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $987.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $354.8M |
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B |
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $76.0M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.0M | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.4% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-245.6M |
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-256.6M |
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -101.6% |
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLIBA
Segment breakdown not available.
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
