vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GCI Liberty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($257.0M vs $253.4M, roughly 1.0× Palomar Holdings, Inc.). Palomar Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($409.0M vs $21.0M).
GCI Communication Corp (GCI) is a telecommunications corporation operating in Alaska. Through its own facilities and agreements with other providers, GCI provides Internet access, landline, and cellular telephone service. It is a subsidiary of GCI Liberty, Inc.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that primarily provides property insurance products for catastrophe-exposed residential and commercial assets. It mainly operates across the United States, focusing on core segments including earthquake, flood, and windstorm coverage to meet high-risk property protection demands of customers.
GLIBA vs PLMR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $257.0M | $253.4M |
| Net Profit | $-387.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -189.9% | 28.7% |
| Net Margin | -150.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 62.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.34 | $2.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $253.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.0M | $244.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $174.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $131.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $118.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-387.0M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $46.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -189.9% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -150.6% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.34 | $1.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.0M | $106.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $985.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $942.7M |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $3.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $106.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.0M | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.0M | $81.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $119.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $80.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $61.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $985.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $987.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $942.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $878.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $847.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $790.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $729.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $703.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $532.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $501.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $76.0M | $409.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.0M | $409.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | 161.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.4% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $700.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $409.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.0M | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $87.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $261.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $100.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $33.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $409.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $120.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $100.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 161.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | 59.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 167.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 67.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.37× | 2.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
