vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GCI Liberty, Inc. (GLIBA) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GCI Liberty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($257.0M vs $224.2M, roughly 1.1× STAG Industrial, Inc.). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs -150.6%, a 178.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
GCI Communication Corp (GCI) is a telecommunications corporation operating in Alaska. Through its own facilities and agreements with other providers, GCI provides Internet access, landline, and cellular telephone service. It is a subsidiary of GCI Liberty, Inc.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
GLIBA vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $257.0M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | $-387.0M | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -189.9% | — |
| Net Margin | -150.6% | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-13.34 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.0M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.0M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-387.0M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -189.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -150.6% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.34 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $124.0M | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $985.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $3.0B | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.0M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.0M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $985.0M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $987.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $76.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 8.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.4% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $104.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $76.0M | $143.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.0M | $111.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $122.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $62.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $57.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $86.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $105.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.4% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.37× | 2.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
