vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and Kestrel Group Ltd (KG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gloo Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $17.4M, roughly 1.9× Kestrel Group Ltd). Kestrel Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — -29.0% vs -116.9%, a 87.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Kestrel is an American bicycle brand which specialized in high-end bikes for triathlons and road racing.
GLOO vs KG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $17.4M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $-5.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | -23.3% |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | -29.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | $-0.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $69.9M |
| Q4 25 | -82.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -116.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1258.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.08 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | $12.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | $174.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | $143.8M |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.0M |
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $174.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $173.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $143.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $150.1M |
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | $-9.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-20.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
KG
Segment breakdown not available.
