vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $32.6M, roughly 1.3× Gloo Holdings, Inc.). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $-63.4M).
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
GLOO vs NAMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | — |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | $7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | 17.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.6% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
NAMM
Segment breakdown not available.
