vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) and Massimo Group (MAMO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gloo Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $21.0M, roughly 1.5× Massimo Group). Massimo Group runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs -116.9%, a 126.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Massimo Dutti, S.A. is a Spanish premium clothing retailer specializing in cashmere and wool products, established in 1985 and owned by Spanish multinational company Inditex, the parent company of Zara, Pull&Bear, and other brands.
GLOO vs MAMO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.6M | $21.0M |
| Net Profit | $-38.0M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | -82.0% | 13.1% |
| Net Margin | -116.9% | 9.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 12.2% | 215.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.08 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $35.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-38.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $77.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 34.7% |
| Q4 25 | -82.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | -116.9% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.08 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $15.1M | $5.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $176.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-444.4M | $23.7M |
| Total Assets | $206.7M | $51.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $176.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-444.4M | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.1M |
| Q4 25 | $206.7M | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $46.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.0M | $4.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -194.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-63.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $633.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-637.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-63.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-741.4K |
| Q4 25 | -194.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 49.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -17.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
MAMO
Segment breakdown not available.
