vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (GO) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.7× Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs -18.5%, a 34.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 10.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 8.3%).
Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. is an American discount closeout retailer consisting exclusively of supermarket locations that offer discounted, overstocked, and closeout products from name-brand and private-label suppliers. The company has stores in California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, and Delaware.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
GO vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $-224.9M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | -18.5% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.7% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -669.9% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.22 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $-224.9M | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.3M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.2M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | 29.7% | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.4% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.4% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.5% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.1% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.9% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | -18.5% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $-2.22 | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.24 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $69.6M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $15.0M | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $983.7M | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $69.6M | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.1M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.2M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.9M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.8M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.7M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.1M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | $15.0M | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $473.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.5M | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $429.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $379.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $983.7M | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.02× | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $222.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $222.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.6M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.9M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.5M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.0M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.6M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.49× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.84× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.09× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.95× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.97× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
