vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Roper Technologies (ROP) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.9× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 14.3%, a 1.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 1.7%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
ROP vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $331.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 69.4% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 27.2% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 15.8% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.3% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 842.6% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.87 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $331.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.4M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $398.5M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $378.3M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $331.1M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $462.3M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $367.9M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.1M | $118.2M |
| Q1 26 | 69.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 69.5% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.5% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.7% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.2% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.5% | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | 21.4% |
| Q1 26 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | $4.87 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.97 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.68 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.49 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.06 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.29 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.40 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.12 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $382.9M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.7B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.8B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $34.6B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.52× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $382.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $297.4M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $320.0M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $242.4M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $372.8M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $188.2M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $269.6M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.5M | $184.4M |
| Q1 26 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.3B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | $18.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $34.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.6B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.6B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.2B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.3B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $507.0M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.2% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $738.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $869.5M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.1M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $528.7M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $722.2M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $755.4M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $384.1M | $196.9M |
| Q1 26 | $507.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $100.8M |
| Q1 26 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.72× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.18× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.07× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.60× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.56× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.14× | 1.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
