vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (GO) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs -18.5%, a 32.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs -72.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (8.3% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. is an American discount closeout retailer consisting exclusively of supermarket locations that offer discounted, overstocked, and closeout products from name-brand and private-label suppliers. The company has stores in California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio, and Delaware.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
GO vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $-224.9M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | -18.5% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -72.2% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -669.9% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.22 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $-224.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.3M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.2M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.0M | $118.2M |
| Q1 26 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.4% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.4% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.5% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.1% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.9% | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 21.4% |
| Q1 26 | -18.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | $-2.22 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.24 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $69.6M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $15.0M | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $983.7M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.02× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $69.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.1M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.2M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.9M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.8M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.7M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.1M | $184.4M |
| Q1 26 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.3M | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $473.9M | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.7M | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.5M | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $429.3M | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $379.2M | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | $983.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.42× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.40× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | 3.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $222.1M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $222.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.6M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.9M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.5M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.6M | $196.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.6M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.4M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.6M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.3M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $100.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.49× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.84× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.09× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.95× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.97× | 1.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GO
Segment breakdown not available.
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
