vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) and LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC (LSAK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GoPro, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($201.7M vs $178.7M, roughly 1.1× LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, LESAKA TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.4% vs 0.4%). GoPro, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.0M vs $-14.8M). Over the past eight quarters, GoPro, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs 13.7%).

GoPro, Inc. is an American technology company founded in 2002 by Nick Woodman. It manufactures action cameras and develops its own mobile apps and video-editing software. Founded as Woodman Labs, Inc, the company is based in San Mateo, California.

Lesaka Technologies is a South-African financial technology company that is listed on the NASDAQ and Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Lesaka’s primary focus is on financial inclusion, offering financial services to previously underserved communities and merchants.

GPRO vs LSAK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GPRO
GPRO
1.1× larger
GPRO
$201.7M
$178.7M
LSAK
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LSAK
LSAK
+1.0% gap
LSAK
1.4%
0.4%
GPRO
More free cash flow
GPRO
GPRO
$29.8M more FCF
GPRO
$15.0M
$-14.8M
LSAK
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GPRO
GPRO
Annualised
GPRO
13.9%
13.7%
LSAK

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Revenue
$201.7M
$178.7M
Net Profit
$3.6M
Gross Margin
31.8%
31.4%
Operating Margin
-4.1%
1.2%
Net Margin
2.0%
Revenue YoY
0.4%
1.4%
Net Profit YoY
111.2%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.06
$0.04

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
$201.7M
$178.7M
Q3 25
$162.9M
$171.4M
Q2 25
$152.6M
$168.5M
Q1 25
$134.3M
$161.4M
Q4 24
$200.9M
$176.2M
Q3 24
$258.9M
$153.6M
Q2 24
$186.2M
$146.0M
Q1 24
$155.5M
$138.2M
Net Profit
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
$3.6M
Q3 25
$-21.3M
$-4.3M
Q2 25
$-16.4M
$-28.4M
Q1 25
$-46.7M
$-22.1M
Q4 24
$-32.5M
Q3 24
$-8.2M
$-4.5M
Q2 24
$-47.8M
$-5.0M
Q1 24
$-339.1M
$-4.0M
Gross Margin
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
31.8%
31.4%
Q3 25
35.1%
30.9%
Q2 25
35.8%
28.9%
Q1 25
32.1%
27.5%
Q4 24
34.7%
25.7%
Q3 24
35.5%
22.6%
Q2 24
30.5%
22.6%
Q1 24
34.1%
22.0%
Operating Margin
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
-4.1%
1.2%
Q3 25
-9.8%
0.2%
Q2 25
-9.2%
-16.7%
Q1 25
-33.7%
0.4%
Q4 24
-19.5%
0.3%
Q3 24
-3.1%
-0.0%
Q2 24
-25.0%
0.2%
Q1 24
-26.6%
0.6%
Net Margin
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
2.0%
Q3 25
-13.0%
-2.5%
Q2 25
-10.8%
-16.9%
Q1 25
-34.8%
-13.7%
Q4 24
-18.4%
Q3 24
-3.2%
-3.0%
Q2 24
-25.7%
-3.4%
Q1 24
-218.1%
-2.9%
EPS (diluted)
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
$-0.06
$0.04
Q3 25
$-0.13
$-0.05
Q2 25
$-0.10
$-0.40
Q1 25
$-0.30
$-0.27
Q4 24
$-0.22
$-0.40
Q3 24
$-0.05
$-0.07
Q2 24
$-0.31
$-0.08
Q1 24
$-2.24
$-0.06

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$49.7M
$69.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$44.3M
$216.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$76.5M
$180.6M
Total Assets
$428.0M
$704.6M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.58×
1.20×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
$49.7M
$69.5M
Q3 25
$152.8M
$72.2M
Q2 25
$58.6M
$76.5M
Q1 25
$69.6M
$71.0M
Q4 24
$102.8M
$60.6M
Q3 24
$130.2M
$49.7M
Q2 24
$133.0M
$59.1M
Q1 24
$133.7M
$55.2M
Total Debt
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
$44.3M
$216.8M
Q3 25
$43.9M
$208.1M
Q2 25
$200.8M
Q1 25
$194.7M
Q4 24
$0
$148.7M
Q3 24
$93.1M
$148.5M
Q2 24
$92.9M
$143.2M
Q1 24
$92.7M
$135.7M
Stockholders' Equity
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
$76.5M
$180.6M
Q3 25
$80.5M
$170.4M
Q2 25
$97.9M
$161.6M
Q1 25
$110.0M
$185.2M
Q4 24
$151.7M
$193.3M
Q3 24
$183.9M
$184.2M
Q2 24
$184.7M
$175.9M
Q1 24
$224.9M
$173.1M
Total Assets
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
$428.0M
$704.6M
Q3 25
$538.6M
$652.9M
Q2 25
$439.0M
$653.7M
Q1 25
$462.5M
$649.2M
Q4 24
$543.7M
$640.6M
Q3 24
$661.6M
$551.9M
Q2 24
$556.8M
$558.5M
Q1 24
$575.8M
$551.5M
Debt / Equity
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
0.58×
1.20×
Q3 25
0.55×
1.22×
Q2 25
1.24×
Q1 25
1.05×
Q4 24
0.00×
0.77×
Q3 24
0.51×
0.81×
Q2 24
0.50×
0.81×
Q1 24
0.41×
0.78×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$15.6M
$-10.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$15.0M
$-14.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
7.4%
-8.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.3%
2.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-2.99×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-24.0M
$-15.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
$15.6M
$-10.9M
Q3 25
$12.2M
$8.9M
Q2 25
$8.8M
$-9.1M
Q1 25
$-57.2M
$10.7M
Q4 24
$-25.1M
$-9.2M
Q3 24
$-2.2M
$-4.1M
Q2 24
$605.0K
$5.7M
Q1 24
$-98.4M
$19.2M
Free Cash Flow
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
$15.0M
$-14.8M
Q3 25
$11.2M
$4.9M
Q2 25
$8.3M
$-13.2M
Q1 25
$-58.5M
$7.8M
Q4 24
$-25.5M
$-15.5M
Q3 24
$-4.2M
$-8.1M
Q2 24
$-111.0K
$937.0K
Q1 24
$-99.4M
$16.2M
FCF Margin
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
7.4%
-8.3%
Q3 25
6.9%
2.9%
Q2 25
5.4%
-7.8%
Q1 25
-43.5%
4.9%
Q4 24
-12.7%
-8.8%
Q3 24
-1.6%
-5.3%
Q2 24
-0.1%
0.6%
Q1 24
-63.9%
11.7%
Capex Intensity
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
0.3%
2.2%
Q3 25
0.6%
2.3%
Q2 25
0.3%
2.4%
Q1 25
1.0%
1.7%
Q4 24
0.2%
3.6%
Q3 24
0.8%
2.6%
Q2 24
0.4%
3.2%
Q1 24
0.6%
2.1%
Cash Conversion
GPRO
GPRO
LSAK
LSAK
Q4 25
-2.99×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GPRO
GPRO

Subscription And Services$106.3M53%
Other$95.4M47%

LSAK
LSAK

Telecom Products And Services$82.0M46%
Processing Fees$37.6M21%
Enterprise Segment$14.5M8%
Rest Of Africa$10.9M6%
Technology Products$8.6M5%
Insurance Revenue$7.9M4%
Lending Revenue$7.2M4%
Other$6.7M4%
Interest From Customer$2.1M1%
Other Products And Services$1.2M1%

Related Comparisons