vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) and NEOGENOMICS INC (NEO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GoPro, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($201.7M vs $186.7M, roughly 1.1× NEOGENOMICS INC). On growth, NEOGENOMICS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, GoPro, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs 6.5%).

GoPro, Inc. is an American technology company founded in 2002 by Nick Woodman. It manufactures action cameras and develops its own mobile apps and video-editing software. Founded as Woodman Labs, Inc, the company is based in San Mateo, California.

NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc., also known as NeoGenomics or Neo, is an American CLIA-certified clinical laboratory, pharma services and information services company that specializes in cancer genetics diagnostic testing. The company's testing services include cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, anatomic pathology, and molecular genetics.

GPRO vs NEO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GPRO
GPRO
1.1× larger
GPRO
$201.7M
$186.7M
NEO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
NEO
NEO
+10.7% gap
NEO
11.1%
0.4%
GPRO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GPRO
GPRO
Annualised
GPRO
13.9%
6.5%
NEO

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Revenue
$201.7M
$186.7M
Net Profit
$-108.0M
Gross Margin
31.8%
43.3%
Operating Margin
-4.1%
46.9%
Net Margin
-57.9%
Revenue YoY
0.4%
11.1%
Net Profit YoY
42.0%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.06
$-0.13

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
$186.7M
Q4 25
$201.7M
$190.2M
Q3 25
$162.9M
$187.8M
Q2 25
$152.6M
$181.3M
Q1 25
$134.3M
$168.0M
Q4 24
$200.9M
$172.0M
Q3 24
$258.9M
$167.8M
Q2 24
$186.2M
$164.5M
Net Profit
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
$-108.0M
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-21.3M
$-27.1M
Q2 25
$-16.4M
$-45.1M
Q1 25
$-46.7M
$-25.9M
Q4 24
Q3 24
$-8.2M
$-17.7M
Q2 24
$-47.8M
$-18.6M
Gross Margin
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
43.3%
Q4 25
31.8%
43.8%
Q3 25
35.1%
42.8%
Q2 25
35.8%
42.6%
Q1 25
32.1%
43.6%
Q4 24
34.7%
44.9%
Q3 24
35.5%
44.6%
Q2 24
30.5%
44.1%
Operating Margin
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
46.9%
Q4 25
-4.1%
-7.1%
Q3 25
-9.8%
-14.4%
Q2 25
-9.2%
-26.3%
Q1 25
-33.7%
-16.6%
Q4 24
-19.5%
-10.7%
Q3 24
-3.1%
-12.6%
Q2 24
-25.0%
-13.3%
Net Margin
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
-57.9%
Q4 25
Q3 25
-13.0%
-14.4%
Q2 25
-10.8%
-24.9%
Q1 25
-34.8%
-15.4%
Q4 24
Q3 24
-3.2%
-10.5%
Q2 24
-25.7%
-11.3%
EPS (diluted)
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
$-0.13
Q4 25
$-0.06
Q3 25
$-0.13
Q2 25
$-0.10
Q1 25
$-0.30
Q4 24
$-0.22
Q3 24
$-0.05
Q2 24
$-0.31

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$49.7M
$146.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$44.3M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$76.5M
$828.8M
Total Assets
$428.0M
$1.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.58×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
$146.1M
Q4 25
$49.7M
$159.6M
Q3 25
$152.8M
$164.1M
Q2 25
$58.6M
$154.7M
Q1 25
$69.6M
$346.2M
Q4 24
$102.8M
$367.0M
Q3 24
$130.2M
$362.0M
Q2 24
$133.0M
$355.1M
Total Debt
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
Q4 25
$44.3M
$341.9M
Q3 25
$43.9M
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$0
$541.1M
Q3 24
$93.1M
Q2 24
$92.9M
Stockholders' Equity
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
$828.8M
Q4 25
$76.5M
$836.6M
Q3 25
$80.5M
$838.3M
Q2 25
$97.9M
$854.0M
Q1 25
$110.0M
$888.3M
Q4 24
$151.7M
$902.3M
Q3 24
$183.9M
$908.2M
Q2 24
$184.7M
$915.9M
Total Assets
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
$1.3B
Q4 25
$428.0M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$538.6M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$439.0M
$1.4B
Q1 25
$462.5M
$1.6B
Q4 24
$543.7M
$1.6B
Q3 24
$661.6M
$1.6B
Q2 24
$556.8M
$1.6B
Debt / Equity
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.58×
0.41×
Q3 25
0.55×
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.00×
0.60×
Q3 24
0.51×
Q2 24
0.50×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$15.6M
$-8.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$15.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
7.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-24.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
$-8.1M
Q4 25
$15.6M
$1.3M
Q3 25
$12.2M
$8.9M
Q2 25
$8.8M
$20.3M
Q1 25
$-57.2M
$-25.3M
Q4 24
$-25.1M
$9.8M
Q3 24
$-2.2M
$9.2M
Q2 24
$605.0K
$13.9M
Free Cash Flow
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
Q4 25
$15.0M
$-6.5M
Q3 25
$11.2M
$570.0K
Q2 25
$8.3M
$14.0M
Q1 25
$-58.5M
$-29.8M
Q4 24
$-25.5M
$-1.8M
Q3 24
$-4.2M
$-1.6M
Q2 24
$-111.0K
$814.0K
FCF Margin
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
Q4 25
7.4%
-3.4%
Q3 25
6.9%
0.3%
Q2 25
5.4%
7.7%
Q1 25
-43.5%
-17.8%
Q4 24
-12.7%
-1.0%
Q3 24
-1.6%
-0.9%
Q2 24
-0.1%
0.5%
Capex Intensity
GPRO
GPRO
NEO
NEO
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.3%
4.1%
Q3 25
0.6%
4.4%
Q2 25
0.3%
3.5%
Q1 25
1.0%
2.7%
Q4 24
0.2%
6.7%
Q3 24
0.8%
6.4%
Q2 24
0.4%
8.0%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

GPRO
GPRO

Subscription And Services$106.3M53%
Other$95.4M47%

NEO
NEO

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons