vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) and Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($260.4M vs $201.7M, roughly 1.3× GoPro, Inc.). On growth, GoPro, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -9.4%). GoPro, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.0M vs $8.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs 13.9%).
GoPro, Inc. is an American technology company founded in 2002 by Nick Woodman. It manufactures action cameras and develops its own mobile apps and video-editing software. Founded as Woodman Labs, Inc, the company is based in San Mateo, California.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
GPRO vs SDHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $201.7M | $260.4M |
| Net Profit | — | $3.5M |
| Gross Margin | 31.8% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | -9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -14.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $201.7M | $260.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.9M | $262.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.6M | $223.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $134.3M | $224.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.9M | $287.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $258.9M | $277.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.2M | $220.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $155.5M | $189.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.3M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.2M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-339.1M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | 31.8% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.1% | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.7% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.5% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.1% | 26.1% |
| Q4 25 | -4.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.5% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.0% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.6% | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -218.1% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.30 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.22 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.31 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.24 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.7M | $12.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $44.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $76.5M | $86.7M |
| Total Assets | $428.0M | $557.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.58× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.7M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.8M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.6M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.6M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.8M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.2M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.0M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $133.7M | $32.8M |
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $92.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $76.5M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.5M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.9M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.0M | $76.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.7M | $73.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $183.9M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.7M | $62.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $224.9M | $59.7M |
| Q4 25 | $428.0M | $557.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.6M | $571.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0M | $570.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.5M | $513.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $543.7M | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $661.6M | $460.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $556.8M | $429.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $575.8M | $401.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.41× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.6M | $9.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.0M | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.4% | 3.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-24.0M | $-36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.2M | $-34.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.1M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $605.0K | $39.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-98.4M | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $-31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-58.5M | $-35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.5M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-111.0K | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-99.4M | $-9.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.5% | -16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -63.9% | -5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPRO
| Subscription And Services | $106.3M | 53% |
| Other | $95.4M | 47% |
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
