vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) and SITIME Corp (SITM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GoPro, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($201.7M vs $113.6M, roughly 1.8× SITIME Corp). On growth, SITIME Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (88.3% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, SITIME Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.9% CAGR vs 13.9%).
GoPro, Inc. is an American technology company founded in 2002 by Nick Woodman. It manufactures action cameras and develops its own mobile apps and video-editing software. Founded as Woodman Labs, Inc, the company is based in San Mateo, California.
SiTime Corporation is a publicly traded fabless chipmaker based in Santa Clara, California that develops micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), used for timing devices in electronics.
GPRO vs SITM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $201.7M | $113.6M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 31.8% | 59.0% |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | 30.2% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 88.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $113.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $201.7M | $113.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.9M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.6M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $134.3M | $60.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.9M | $68.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $258.9M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.2M | $43.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.3M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.4M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $-23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.2M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.8M | $-26.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.8% | 56.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 51.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.1% | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.7% | 52.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.5% | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | 49.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.8% | -19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | -35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.7% | -46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.5% | -33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | -43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.0% | -73.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.0% | -9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.8% | -29.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.8% | -39.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | -33.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.7% | -61.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.30 | $-1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.22 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.31 | $-1.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.7M | $498.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $44.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $76.5M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $428.0M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.58× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $498.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $76.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.0M | $692.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.7M | $699.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $183.9M | $696.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.7M | $692.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.5M | $872.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $543.7M | $885.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $661.6M | $877.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $556.8M | $878.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-24.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.2M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.1M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $605.0K | $-181.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-58.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.5M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-111.0K | $-2.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.5% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.7% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.6% | -11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | -6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPRO
| Subscription And Services | $106.3M | 53% |
| Other | $95.4M | 47% |
SITM
Segment breakdown not available.