vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STAG Industrial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($224.2M vs $201.7M, roughly 1.1× GoPro, Inc.). On growth, STAG Industrial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, GoPro, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs 8.7%).
GoPro, Inc. is an American technology company founded in 2002 by Nick Woodman. It manufactures action cameras and develops its own mobile apps and video-editing software. Founded as Woodman Labs, Inc, the company is based in San Mateo, California.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
GPRO vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $201.7M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | 31.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $201.7M | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.9M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.6M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $134.3M | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.9M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $258.9M | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.2M | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.3M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.4M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.7M | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.2M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.8M | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.0% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.8% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.8% | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.7% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.30 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.31 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $49.7M | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $44.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $76.5M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $428.0M | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.58× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.7M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $152.8M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.6M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.6M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.8M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.2M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.0M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.3M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.1M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.9M | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $76.5M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.5M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.9M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.7M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $183.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $184.7M | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $428.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.6M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $439.0M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $462.5M | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $543.7M | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $661.6M | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $556.8M | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.58× | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.51× | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 0.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-24.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.6M | $104.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $143.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $111.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-57.2M | $103.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.1M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $605.0K | $122.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.0M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $62.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-58.5M | $57.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.5M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $86.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-111.0K | $105.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.5% | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.7% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.6% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPRO
| Subscription And Services | $106.3M | 53% |
| Other | $95.4M | 47% |
STAG
Segment breakdown not available.
