vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) and Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.3M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.5× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). Hyperscale Data, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -112.0% vs -1545.5%, a 1433.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs 12.7%). Northfield Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($52.5M vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (15.0% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is a regional bank holding company based in the United States, operating primarily across the U.S. Northeast region. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, mortgage loans, commercial lending, and wealth management solutions for retail consumers, small to medium-sized businesses and local community clients.
GPUS vs NFBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.9M | $41.3M |
| Net Profit | $-30.1M | $-27.4M |
| Gross Margin | 14.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -117.8% | -1263.3% |
| Net Margin | -112.0% | -1545.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 38.4% | 12.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6670.3% | -343.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.9M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $39.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $38.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.0M | $34.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $36.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $31.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.4M | $31.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-30.1M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.0M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.1M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-445.0K | $11.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.5M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -21.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -117.8% | -1263.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -57.8% | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.2% | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.5% | 31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.8% | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79.2% | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -151.4% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 27.2% |
| Q4 25 | -112.0% | -1545.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -53.5% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.7% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.8% | 22.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -82.3% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -190.7% | 18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.7% | 19.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.39 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.66 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.78 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.82 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.81 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.32 | $0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.1M | $164.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $83.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.8M | $690.1M |
| Total Assets | $313.7M | $5.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.1M | $164.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.8M | $131.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9M | $97.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $101.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $167.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $232.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $153.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.9M | $238.8M |
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $88.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.7M | $666.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.8M | $690.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $719.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $710.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $711.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $704.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $699.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $693.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.0M | $698.4M |
| Q4 25 | $313.7M | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.4M | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $213.5M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $218.5M | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $220.8M | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.5M | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $299.8M | $5.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.19× | 0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.51× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-37.7M | $53.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-56.2M | $52.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -208.7% | 127.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 68.6% | 2.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-87.1M | $89.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-37.7M | $53.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.8M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.1M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.0M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.2M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.2M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-56.2M | $52.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.6M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.3M | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.6M | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | -208.7% | 127.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -84.5% | 34.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | 35.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.3% | 26.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.6% | 81.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.4% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.3% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | 68.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.76× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.75× | 0.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
NFBK
Segment breakdown not available.
