vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Grab Holdings Ltd (GRAB) and SCANSOURCE, INC. (SCSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Grab Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $766.5M, roughly 1.9× SCANSOURCE, INC.). SCANSOURCE, INC. runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs 1.8%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Grab Holdings Inc. is a Singaporean multinational technology company headquartered in one-north, Singapore. It is the developer of a super-app for ride-hailing, food delivery, and digital payment services on mobile devices. It operates in Singapore, Malaysia, Cambodia, Indonesia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam.
ScanSource, Inc. is a leading global specialty technology distributor offering a broad portfolio of solutions including point-of-sale systems, barcode scanning tools, cybersecurity products, cloud services and communication solutions. It primarily serves value-added resellers, managed service providers and enterprise clients across North America, Latin America and Europe, covering retail, healthcare, industrial and public sector core segments.
GRAB vs SCSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $766.5M |
| Net Profit | $26.0M | $16.5M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -3.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $766.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $739.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $812.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $704.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $747.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $775.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $746.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $752.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.01 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0B | $83.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.4B | $910.9M |
| Total Assets | $9.3B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $124.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $126.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $146.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $110.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $185.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $159.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $910.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $914.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $906.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $901.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4B | $900.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $920.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $924.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $944.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $591.0M | $30.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 22.73× | 1.87× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $30.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $591.0M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $160.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $157.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.73× | -0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.51× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GRAB
Segment breakdown not available.
SCSC
| Products And Services | $723.4M | 94% |
| Intelisys Advisory | $25.0M | 3% |
| Recurring Revenue | $18.2M | 2% |
