vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc. (GRDN) and Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.6M vs $183.8M, roughly 1.8× Wheels Up Experience Inc.). Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.0% vs -15.7%, a 19.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -10.2%).
CVS Pharmacy Inc. is an American retail corporation. A subsidiary of CVS Health, it is headquartered in Woonsocket, Rhode Island. Originally named the Consumer Value Stores, it was founded in Lowell, Massachusetts, in 1963.
Wheels Up is a provider of "on demand" private aviation in the United States and one of the largest private aviation companies in the world. It was founded in 2013 by Kenny Dichter, using a membership/on-demand business model. Wheels Up members can book private aircraft from the company fleet and third-party operators using a mobile application.
GRDN vs UP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.6M | $183.8M |
| Net Profit | $13.5M | $-28.9M |
| Gross Margin | 22.7% | 14.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | -0.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.0% | -15.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.2% | -10.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 46.1% | 67.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.21 | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $336.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $397.6M | $183.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $377.4M | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $344.3M | $189.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $177.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $204.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.4M | $193.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $196.3M |
| Q1 26 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.9M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $-83.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $-82.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | $-99.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-87.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-122.0M | $-57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-97.0M |
| Q1 26 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | -33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | -31.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -45.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -26.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -33.3% | -21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -40.3% |
| Q1 26 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | -15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | -45.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | -43.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | -55.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -42.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.8% | -29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -49.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.9M | $133.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $671.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $232.4M | $-392.1M |
| Total Assets | $426.9M | $968.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $64.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $65.6M | $133.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.5M | $125.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $107.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $171.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $216.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.2M | $115.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $141.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0 | $671.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $766.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $770.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $765.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $761.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.3M | $596.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $597.4M |
| Q1 26 | $232.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $217.9M | $-392.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.5M | $-374.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.7M | $-347.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $163.2M | $-288.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-202.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.9M | $-117.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-72.2M |
| Q1 26 | $426.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $412.7M | $968.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $390.0M | $973.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $356.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $348.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.1M | $-18.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-58.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -31.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 21.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.45× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-259.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.6M | $-18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.2M | $-37.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.9M | $-62.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.6M | $-47.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-25.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-58.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $-60.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-78.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-62.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -41.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -35.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -34.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -15.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.21× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.86× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
