vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) and Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hippo Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.4M vs $72.0M, roughly 1.7× Globalstar, Inc.). Hippo Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -16.1%, a 21.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hippo Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 17.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Hippo Holdings Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.9% CAGR vs 12.9%).
Globalstar, Inc. is an American telecommunications company that operates a satellite constellation in low Earth orbit (LEO) for satellite phone, low-speed data transmission and Earth observation. The Globalstar second-generation constellation consists of 25 satellites.
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
GSAT vs HIPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.0M | $120.4M |
| Net Profit | $-11.6M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | -16.1% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 17.6% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 76.9% | -86.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $72.0M | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.1M | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.0M | $110.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.2M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.3M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.5M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1M | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.3M | $-47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-50.2M | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.7M | $-40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.2M | $-35.7M |
| Q4 25 | -0.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.2% | -41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.0% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.4% | -40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.3% | -38.7% |
| Q4 25 | -16.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -28.9% | -43.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -82.1% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.0% | -45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | -42.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $3.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $-1.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.57 | $1.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-1.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-1.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $447.5M | $218.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $483.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $355.7M | $436.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.36× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $447.5M | $218.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $346.3M | $247.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $308.2M | $198.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.4M | $140.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $391.2M | $197.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.3M | $223.4M |
| Q4 25 | $483.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $508.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $491.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $502.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $511.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $393.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $398.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $355.7M | $436.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $364.8M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $360.9M | $332.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.3M | $322.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $358.9M | $362.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.1M | $326.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.0M | $322.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $377.1M | $351.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $926.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $917.0M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $175.9M | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $9.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $14.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $175.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.0M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.9M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.9M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $340.7M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.0M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.7M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 216.53× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.22× | 19.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSAT
| Services | $67.4M | 94% |
| Products | $4.6M | 6% |
HIPO
Segment breakdown not available.