vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (GSHD) and IMAX CORP (IMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $93.1M, roughly 1.3× Goosehead Insurance, Inc.). Goosehead Insurance, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.6% vs 0.5%, a 8.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 23.1%). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs 9.2%).
Goosehead Insurance is a U.S.-based personal lines insurance agency that offers a wide range of coverage products including auto, home, renters, flood, and specialty insurance. It partners with hundreds of insurance carriers to provide clients with tailored, cost-effective coverage options, operating via corporate locations and a national franchise network for independent agents.
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
GSHD vs IMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.1M | $125.2M |
| Net Profit | $8.0M | $637.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.6% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 19.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.6% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | 35.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 204.0% | -88.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.3M | $125.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.4M | $106.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.0M | $91.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.6M | $86.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.9M | $92.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.0M | $91.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.1M | $89.0M |
| Q1 26 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $637.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $3.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.4% |
| Q1 26 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.7% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.7M | $151.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-121.3M | $337.9M |
| Total Assets | $392.8M | $894.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.4M | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | $143.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $109.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.2M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.3M | $100.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.5M | $104.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.6M | $91.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $290.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-121.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-95.5M | $337.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-105.0M | $349.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-78.6M | $320.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-88.5M | $299.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $299.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.3M | $289.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $267.2M |
| Q1 26 | $392.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $414.9M | $894.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.6M | $889.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $436.6M | $868.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $412.6M | $848.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $397.7M | $830.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $358.1M | $847.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $827.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 46.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $118.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $91.8M | $29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.9M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $35.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.1M | $28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.6M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $34.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6M | $33.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 81.8% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 37.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.38× | 46.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.06× | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.61× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.61× | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.82× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.72× | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | 9.78× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSHD
| Renewal Royalty Fees (2) | $43.6M | 47% |
| Renewal Commissions (1) | $18.2M | 20% |
| Contingent Commissions (1) | $10.7M | 11% |
| New Business Royalty Fees (2) | $7.9M | 8% |
| New Business Commissions (1) | $7.5M | 8% |
| Other | $3.7M | 4% |
| Initial Franchise Fees (2) | $1.6M | 2% |
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
