vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (GSHD) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Latham Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($100.0M vs $93.1M, roughly 1.1× Goosehead Insurance, Inc.). Goosehead Insurance, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.6% vs -7.0%, a 15.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Goosehead Insurance, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs 14.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.2% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Goosehead Insurance is a U.S.-based personal lines insurance agency that offers a wide range of coverage products including auto, home, renters, flood, and specialty insurance. It partners with hundreds of insurance carriers to provide clients with tailored, cost-effective coverage options, operating via corporate locations and a national franchise network for independent agents.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
GSHD vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.1M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $8.0M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | 8.6% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 204.0% | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.3M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.4M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.0M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.6M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.9M | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.0M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.1M | $160.1M |
| Q1 26 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $13.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% |
| Q1 26 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-121.3M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $392.8M | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.5M | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $290.0M | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.8M | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.3M | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.6M | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | $282.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-121.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-95.5M | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-105.0M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-78.6M | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-88.5M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.3M | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $408.1M |
| Q1 26 | $392.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $414.9M | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.6M | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $436.6M | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $412.6M | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $397.7M | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $358.1M | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $830.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.87× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.45× | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | 0.69× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $91.8M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.9M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.5M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $52.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.1M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.6M | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6M | $47.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 81.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.1% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 29.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.38× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.06× | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.61× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.61× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.72× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | 3.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSHD
| Renewal Royalty Fees (2) | $43.6M | 47% |
| Renewal Commissions (1) | $18.2M | 20% |
| Contingent Commissions (1) | $10.7M | 11% |
| New Business Royalty Fees (2) | $7.9M | 8% |
| New Business Commissions (1) | $7.5M | 8% |
| Other | $3.7M | 4% |
| Initial Franchise Fees (2) | $1.6M | 2% |
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
