vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) and HARTE HANKS INC (HHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HARTE HANKS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.9M vs $32.7M, roughly 1.2× Good Times Restaurants Inc.). HARTE HANKS INC runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs 0.6%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Good Times Restaurants Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-10.0% vs -15.4%). Good Times Restaurants Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.2M vs $-686.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Good Times Restaurants Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.7% CAGR vs -6.4%).
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
Harte Hanks is a global marketing services company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. Harte Hanks services include analytics, strategy, marketing technology, creative services, digital marketing, customer care, direct mail, logistics, and fulfillment.
GTIM vs HHS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.7M | $39.9M |
| Net Profit | $181.0K | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | -0.3% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | -15.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3M | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | $47.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.4M | $45.4M |
| Q4 25 | $181.0K | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-624.0K | $-335.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-392.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.0K | $142.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-27.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $618.0K | $-171.0K |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | -61.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-3.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.2M | $20.5M |
| Total Assets | $82.5M | $91.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | $11.5M |
| Q4 25 | $33.2M | $20.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.6M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.4M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.6M | $20.0M |
| Q4 25 | $82.5M | $91.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.8M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.9M | $95.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $100.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.5M | $101.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.1M | $108.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.1M | $109.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.0M | $113.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4M | $737.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | $-686.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.8% | -1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.85× | 0.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-72.0K | $-4.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $737.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $714.0K | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-818.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-518.0K | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.0K | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $-686.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.0K | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-105.0K | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-923.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-466.0K | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $926.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2M | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.3% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | -13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.85× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.71× | -20.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.44× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.86× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTIM
Segment breakdown not available.
HHS
| Fulfillment And Logistics Services | $17.3M | 43% |
| Customer Care | $13.7M | 34% |
| Other | $8.9M | 22% |
