vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Namib Minerals is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($41.9M vs $32.7M, roughly 1.3× Good Times Restaurants Inc.). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $1.2M).
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
GTIM vs NAMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.7M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $181.0K | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3M | $41.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $33.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $181.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-624.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $618.0K | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-556.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -1.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -1.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $82.5M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $3.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $31.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $82.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $89.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $90.1M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | $7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.8% | 17.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.85× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-72.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $714.0K | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-518.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-252.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-105.0K | $7.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-466.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-700.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -2.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 1.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.85× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.44× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.86× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
