vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) and Orion Properties Inc. (ONL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Orion Properties Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($36.3M vs $32.7M, roughly 1.1× Good Times Restaurants Inc.). Good Times Restaurants Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs -37.4%, a 38.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Orion Properties Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.6% vs -10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Good Times Restaurants Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.7% CAGR vs -4.9%).
Good Times is a Golden, Colorado–based fast-food restaurant specializing in premium burgers and frozen custard. As of July 2023, the chain operates 31 locations, down from 38 in 2015.
GTIM vs ONL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.7M | $36.3M |
| Net Profit | $181.0K | $-13.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | -9.3% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | -37.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | -4.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | -45.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.7M | $35.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $37.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | $38.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | $39.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | $40.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-13.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $181.0K | $-35.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $-69.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-624.0K | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.0K | $-32.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.0K | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-33.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | -101.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | -185.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.5% | -67.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | -85.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | -25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | -84.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | -37.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | -101.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.0% | -186.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.8% | -67.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | -85.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.5% | -84.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $-0.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $-0.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $10.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $33.2M | $608.5M |
| Total Assets | $82.5M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $17.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $465.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $505.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $492.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $485.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $462.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $608.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.2M | $623.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.1M | $658.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.6M | $728.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $753.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.4M | $763.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.4M | $800.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.3M | $816.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $82.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.1M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 51.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.85× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-72.0K | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $714.0K | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-518.0K | $54.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.0K | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $17.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-105.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-466.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.85× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.44× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GTIM
Segment breakdown not available.
ONL
| Rental | $36.1M | 100% |
| Fee income from unconsolidated joint venture | $137.0K | 0% |
